IAS 36 impairment triggers for AI models
The indicators IAS 36 lists
IAS 36 sets a minimum list of external and internal indicators to consider at each reporting date IAS 36 §12. External indicators include significant adverse changes in the technological or market environment and declines in value. Internal indicators include evidence of obsolescence or physical damage and evidence that economic performance is, or will be, worse than expected.
Which apply to a token-built asset
- External: a superseding foundation model, or a sharp fall in inference prices that changes the build-versus-buy calculus.
- External: an announced deprecation date for the underlying model or endpoint the asset depends on.
- Internal: evidence of obsolescence, such as adoption falling as users move to a newer capability.
- Internal: worse-than-expected economic performance from the asset relative to the case that justified capitalising it.
When a test is required
The indicator review is done at each reporting date; a formal recoverable- amount test is required only when an indicator exists IAS 36 §12. For AI assets the review is not a formality, because indicators arise between reporting dates whenever a provider announces a deprecation or a materially better model ships. A mid-period announcement is itself the trigger to test.
Evidencing the assessment
Whether or not an indicator is found, the assessment should be documented: the indicators considered, the evidence reviewed, and the conclusion. Where an indicator is found and a test performed, the recoverable-amount workings and the resulting loss are retained. This file is what an auditor tests, and its absence is a common weakness in fast-moving AI portfolios.